Navigating Market Correlations: The Role of Gold, Bitcoin, and S&P 500 in Portfolio Optimization

Target Audience: New Analysts and Students

In investment management, selecting the proper asset allocation and diversification strategy is essential for maximizing returns while effectively managing risks. Investors often find it challenging to create a portfolio that balances growth opportunities with stability across various market conditions. This blog post will discuss the importance of asset allocation, examine the correlations between different asset classes, and explore their implications for portfolio construction, evaluate the role of popular investment vehicles such as the S&P 500, precious metals like gold, and cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin in a well-rounded investment strategy, and delve into the relationship between diversification and market dynamics, aiming to aid investors in making informed decisions.

(Click on the image to enlarge)

A Comparative Analysis of the Indices and ETFs

The quarterly summary data compiled from the weekly closing prices provides a good overview of the performance and volatility of these key market indicators over the past year. Here's a comparative analysis:

Growth Analysis (Based on Median Annual Growth Rates):

·   BTC (Bitcoin): With a median annual growth of 44.63%, Bitcoin outperformed all other asset classes in the summary, highlighting the high-growth potential associated with cryptocurrencies, albeit with substantial risk.

·    GLD (Gold): Gold demonstrated a substantial growth of 22.45%. Gold is often seen as a safe-haven asset, and this growth could reflect economic uncertainties or increased investor interest in alternative assets.

·    NASDAQ: The technology-heavy NASDAQ showed the highest growth at 16.04% among the stock indices, indicating strong performance in the technology sector during this period.

·    S&P 500: The broad market index, S&P 500, delivered a robust growth of 13.42%, reflecting overall positive market sentiment for large-cap US equities.

·    DOW 30: The blue-chip-focused DOW 30 also showed strong growth at 12.09%, albeit slightly lower than the S&P 500 and NASDAQ.

·    RUSSELL 2000: The small-cap index, RUSSELL 2000, had the lowest median annual growth among the stock indices at 7.78%, suggesting that small-cap stocks, as a whole, did not perform as strongly as their larger counterparts during this period.

Volatility Analysis (Based on Coefficient of Variation - COV):

The Coefficient of Variation (COV) measures the relative volatility of an asset by standardizing the standard deviation by the mean. A higher COV indicates higher volatility relative to the average return.

·    BTC (Bitcoin): With a COV of 20.91%, Bitcoin exhibits the highest volatility compared to the other assets. This is characteristic of the cryptocurrency market, which is known for its significant price swings.

·    GLD (Gold): Gold has the second-highest COV of 8.11%. While higher than the broad market indices, it is significantly lower than Bitcoin, which aligns with its role as a potential hedge against market volatility.

·    NASDAQ: The NASDAQ has the highest COV among the stock indices at 6.78%, indicating higher volatility than the more diversified S&P 500 and DOW 30, which can be attributed to the growth-oriented and potentially more speculative nature of many technology stocks.

·    RUSSELL 2000: The RUSSELL 2000 also shows a relatively high COV of 5.66%, suggesting that small-cap stocks experienced more volatility than large-cap stocks during this period. Small-cap companies are generally considered riskier due to factors like less established business models and greater sensitivity to economic changes.

Comparative Summary:

·     Bitcoin (BTC) offered the highest growth but came with the highest volatility by a significant margin. Investors in Bitcoin experienced substantial potential gains but also faced the most significant risk of price swings.

·     The NASDAQ provided the highest growth among the stock indices, with higher volatility than the S&P 500 and DOW 30. This suggests a higher risk-reward profile for technology-focused investments during this period.

·     The S&P 500 and DOW 30 demonstrated strong and relatively stable growth, with the DOW 30 showing slightly lower volatility. These indices represent a more moderate risk-reward profile than NASDAQ and Bitcoin.

·     Gold (GLD) showed significant growth and moderately high volatility, positioned between the broad market indices and the more volatile growth-oriented cryptocurrency assets.

·     The RUSSELL 2000 had the lowest growth among the stock indices. It exhibited higher volatility than the S&P 500 and DOW 30, indicating a lower risk-adjusted return than large-cap equities during this period.

Overall, from the second quarter of 2024 to the first quarter of 2025, all the indices and alternative assets analyzed experienced growth. However, Bitcoin and Gold outperformed the traditional stock market indices, showcasing the diverse range of investment opportunities available. The investment choice among these assets would depend on an individual's risk tolerance, investment goals, and time horizon. Diversification across different asset classes can help manage risk and enhance portfolio performance.

Using ETFs as Proxy Metrics

Using proxy (Exchange Traded Funds) ETFs for Gold and Bitcoin when direct index prices are not available can be a practical approach, especially when tracking the performance of these assets in a portfolio or comparative analysis. Here are some considerations regarding the use of proxy ETFs for Gold and Bitcoin:

1.   Correlation: Considering the correlation between the proxy ETF and the underlying asset is essential. If the ETF closely tracks the price movements of Gold and Bitcoin, it can serve as a reliable proxy. However, some tracking errors may occur due to management fees, rebalancing, or other factors.

2.   Liquidity: ETFs are typically more liquid than direct assets like physical Gold or Bitcoin, making them easier to trade. This liquidity can be advantageous when investors need to buy or sell quickly.

3.   Diversification: ETFs can provide exposure to Gold and Bitcoin alongside other assets within the ETF, providing a level of diversification that may not be achievable with direct investments.

4.   Accessibility: ETFs are often more accessible to retail investors than physical Gold or bitcoin trading, which may require specialized accounts or platforms.

5.   Cost-efficiency: ETFs generally have lower costs than actively managed funds, making them a cost-effective way to gain exposure to Gold and Bitcoin.

While using proxy ETFs may be a practical choice in many cases, knowing the limitations and potential differences between the ETF and the actual asset is essential. Investors should also consider factors like expense ratios, tracking errors, and the specific structure of the ETF when using them as proxies for specific assets. Conducting thorough research and due diligence on the ETFs chosen can help mitigate risks and ensure alignment with investment objectives.

Generic Asset Allocation Models 

Three generic asset allocation models can be created based on the summary data for individuals at different ages, aligning with their risk tolerance and investment horizon. Here are the asset allocation models for 30, 50, and 70-year-olds:

1. Asset Allocation Model for a 30-Year-Old: 

- Equities: 70% 

- Bonds: 20% 

- Alternative Investments (e.g., Bitcoin): 10% 

Rationale: At 30, individuals typically have a longer investment horizon and can afford to take on more risk for potentially higher returns. A higher allocation to equities, which have historically shown higher returns over the long term, helps to capitalize on growth opportunities. Including alternative investments like Bitcoin allows for exposure to potential high-growth assets.

2. Asset Allocation Model for a 50-Year-Old: 

- Equities: 60% 

- Bonds: 30% 

- Alternative Investments (e.g., Gold): 10% 

Rationale: A 50-year-old investor may start to prioritize capital preservation and income generation as retirement approaches. Thus, a slightly reduced allocation to equities and an increased allocation to bonds provide more stability and income. Alternative investments like Gold can help hedge against market volatility and inflation risks.

3. Asset Allocation Model for a 70-Year-Old: 

- Equities: 15-20% (Dividend) 

- Bonds: 45-50% 

- Cash and Cash Equivalents: 20-30% 

- Commodities (e.g., Gold): 10% 

This allocation aims to maintain a balance between growth potential, income generation, and capital preservation. Bonds and cash equivalents provide stability and liquidity, while a smaller portion is allocated to equities, allowing for some income and growth potential while managing risk.

These asset allocation models serve as generic guidelines and may need to be adjusted based on individual risk tolerance, financial goals, and market conditions. Investors should regularly review and rebalance their portfolios to ensure alignment with their changing financial circumstances and investment objectives. Consulting with a financial advisor can also provide personalized advice tailored to individual needs.

A More Simplified Allocation Approach

Analyzing the correlation matrix of the asset classes is a valuable exercise to understand how different assets move about each other. A high positive correlation suggests that the assets tend to move in the same direction, indicating a strong relationship in their performance.

Given the high positive correlations among the S&P 500, DOW 30, NASDAQ, RUSSELL 2000, Gold (GLD), and Bitcoin (BTC), as shown in the correlation matrix, it's true that diversifying into multiple asset classes may not provide significant portfolio diversification benefits. In such cases, holding a combination of S&P 500 and bond funds could simplify the allocation process without sacrificing diversification.

Here are a few considerations regarding this approach:

1.   Simplicity and Efficiency: By combining a broad-market equity fund like the S&P 500 and a bond fund, investors can quickly and efficiently diversify across asset classes.

2.   Risk Management: For investors looking for a balanced approach that considers market exposure and risk management, a combination of equities and bonds can help achieve a suitable risk-return profile based on their individual risk tolerance and investment horizon.

3.   Age-Based Allocation: Depending on the investor's age, adjusting the allocation between equities and bonds can help align the portfolio with the investor's risk profile. Younger investors may lean more toward equities for growth potential, while retirees may opt for a higher bond allocation for stability.

However, while essential to acknowledge, the positive correlations in the matrix don't necessarily mean that holding other asset classes offers no value. The degree of correlation, the unique risk/return profiles, and an investor's specific circumstances can still justify including small allocations to assets like gold or, for younger investors with higher risk tolerance, even a tiny amount of Bitcoin as part of a broader diversification strategy.

Therefore, while a simple S&P 500/Bond mix is a prudent strategy for many, especially as a core holding, dismissing all other asset classes solely based on positive correlation (without considering the degree and their characteristics) might be too narrow of an approach.

It's about balancing simplicity, diversification, and alignment with individual goals and risk tolerance. For many investors, focusing on a well-diversified portfolio within the equity and bond markets might be sufficient, but understanding the potential role of other asset classes is still valuable.

Conclusion

Navigating the intricacies of portfolio diversification and asset allocation is a perpetual endeavor for investors aiming to achieve financial objectives. As the exploration of investment strategies and the integration of diverse assets such as the S&P 500, Gold, and Bitcoin concludes, it becomes evident that a prudent approach lies in balancing risk and return through a well-structured investment plan. By understanding the correlations between asset classes and avoiding unnecessary overlaps, investors can construct portfolios that align with their risk appetite and long-term goals. Diversification remains a cornerstone of sound investment practices, offering resilience in market volatility and fostering a path toward sustainable wealth creation. 

Understanding the underlying drivers of market movements and the proper degree of independence between asset classes enables investors to make more informed decisions about constructing a practical and manageable portfolio. The key takeaway is not necessarily to chase every potential asset but to build a resilient core that aligns with long-term objectives.

Disclaimer

The information provided in this blog post is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice or recommendations for specific investment decisions. Investing in financial markets involves risk, and readers should conduct their research or consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The performance of assets like the S&P 500, Gold, and Bitcoin can be subject to market fluctuations and individual circumstances. The correlation analysis and asset allocation models presented are generic and may not be suitable for all investors. Readers are encouraged to exercise due diligence and consider their financial goals, risk tolerance, and time horizons before implementing any investment strategies discussed in this blog post.